Brazil’s Ministry of Development, Industry, Trade and Services (MDIC) reported on 14 September that exports through the second week of September reached US$14.25 billion, up 28.5% from the comparable period of September 2025. The release provides an early, value-based indicator of export flows rather than a cargo-loading or vessel-departure count.
For maritime commodity interests, the important signal is divergent performance across Brazil’s principal bulk export chains. Agricultural exports averaged US$353.91 million per working day, 16.46% above the equivalent period a year earlier. Soybean exports averaged US$168.26 million per day, a 19.24% year-on-year increase. By contrast, corn averaged US$65.70 million per day, down 3.70%, while iron ore and concentrates recorded a 4.4% decline in daily-average export value.
The figures should not be read as a direct measure of tonnes loaded. Changes in commodity prices, product mix, customs clearance timing and the number of working days can materially affect the reported values. Nevertheless, they provide a timely indication that soybean export business is contributing more strongly to Brazil’s September export programme, whereas the iron ore and corn legs were softer on this preliminary comparison.
This pattern comes after a substantial grain-export season. Conab reported that, through July, Brazil’s corn exports were 10.53% higher year on year and soybean exports 7.8% higher. The Arco Norte handled 46.12% of corn exports and 39.03% of soybean exports in that period; Santos remained the second-largest gateway for both commodities, with 22.27% of corn and 35.74% of soybean shipments. Those established corridor shares mean that a sustained soybean increase can support demand not only at Santos but also across northern export terminals, rail interfaces, barge systems and anchorage planning.
Why this matters: owners and charterers should treat the release as an early cargo-intelligence input, not a fixture forecast. A stronger soybean value trend may support near-term parceling, terminal nominations and Panamax/Kamsarmax employment, but the data do not establish incremental tonnes or a change in vessel demand. Conversely, softer daily-average iron ore value does not by itself demonstrate reduced Capesize liftings. Operators, cargo interests and claims teams should reconcile customs data with terminal line-ups, bills of lading, draft surveys, berth productivity and weather interruptions before revising exposure, laycan or congestion assumptions.
Technology supported research and drafting. TWS retains editorial responsibility for the published content and cited sources.
Need operational support?
