The International Maritime Organization (IMO) said on 2 October that five seafarers were reported killed during the 29 September recovery of the hijacked product tanker MT HONOUR 25 in Somali waters. Several others were seriously injured. The remaining crew were freed.

The event occurred alongside the release of two other vessels, SEAMULL (also known as SIBU 1) and MT EUREKA. The IMO said 44 seafarers in total were freed from the three vessels during operations in the Western Indian Ocean and Gulf of Aden region. It also stated that 22 seafarers remained captive aboard ASANA, which had been taken hostage earlier in 2026.

Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs independently confirmed the loss of five crew members during the recovery operation, including three Pakistani nationals. It said four crew members, including three Pakistanis, were injured and receiving treatment after survivors were brought ashore at Bandar Beyla and transferred to Garowe. Neither source provides a complete independently verified account of the sequence of violence aboard HONOUR 25; casualty circumstances should therefore be treated with caution while investigations and official reporting continue.

**Operational significance**

This is a severe reminder that a successful vessel recovery does not remove the acute danger to personnel once a ship is under pirate control. Owners, technical managers, charterers and security advisers operating near Somalia, the Gulf of Aden and the wider Western Indian Ocean should reassess voyage-specific security risk rather than infer that individual recoveries signify a normalised threat environment.

Priority checks include ensuring masters have current escalation and reporting contacts; testing ship security plan procedures, citadel readiness, communications redundancy and welfare provisions; and confirming how security-related delay, deviation, extra bunkers, port of refuge, cargo care and general average decisions would be managed contractually. Charterparty and insurance teams should also verify notification duties, war-risk and kidnap-and-ransom conditions, security-provider arrangements, and evidence-preservation procedures for any incident.

For cargo interests and claims handlers, the case highlights the need to establish early, documented communication channels among the owner, manager, insurer, cargo interests, flag administration and relevant authorities. Records of position reports, security alerts, onboard condition, cargo status, instructions and decision times may become central to welfare support, recovery logistics and subsequent claims handling.

The verified releases are significant, but the IMO’s report that ASANA’s crew remain captive means the regional threat has not been resolved. Routing, transit timing and onboard protective measures should remain subject to dynamic review based on authoritative security reporting.

Assisted editorial process

Technology supported research and drafting. TWS retains editorial responsibility for the published content and cited sources.

Need operational support?

Turn intelligence into action.

Request attendance